Monday, August 24, 2020

convenselas :: essays research papers

Estamos preparando el viaje mas largo y divertido que yo haya reverberation en toda mi vida. Ya estamos apuntadas dos amigas y yo. Queremos ir an Europa y conocer varios paises. Pero tenemos que vonencer a dos amigas mas para tener mas ambiente y protegernos una con otra. Ya tenemos la mayoria de edad y estamos preparando para que este viaje este inolvidable. Laura no quiere ir porque tiene miedo a viajar por avion y Elizabeth no quiere porque quiere pasar las vacaciones de verano con sus padres. Tenemos que convenserlas para que este viaje ocean muy emocionante y placentero en task el mes de junio. Empezare por convenzer a Laura. Ella es un poco timida, le teme a las alturas y a los aviones. Claro que a los juegos mecanicos le encanta subirse y sentir la adrenalina. Tratare por convenserla que no tiene chiste subirse an un avion es sumamente seguro. La seguridad es lo early stage es casi imposible que vuelva a sucerder algo como terrorismo. Los pilotos y los copilotos child sumamente precavidos. Los mecanicos siempre revisan el avion bets del vuelo. Vale la pena subirse an un avion para este maravilloso viaje. Conoceremos Espaã ±a, Roma, Venecia, y muchos paises mas que no puedo escojer. Lo que puede haber tambien le dije a Laura child turbulencias pero eso no es siempre, solamente en dadas ocaciones y siempre avisan con tiempo para que te pongas el cinturon de seguridad. Aparte si te gustan los juegos mecanicos hasta se te puede hacer divertido viajar en avion. Porque nuca lo hayas reverberation y porque tu mom le tiene pavor a los aviones no significa que tu tampoco vaz a so portar el vuelo hacia Europa. Ademas segã ºn estudios realizados por prestigiosas aseguranzas dicen que es mucho mas seguro viajar por avion que por automovil. Convenzi an Elizabeth que este viaje es algo muy interesante sera la primera vez que viajamos todas juntas. Solamente child dos semanas y conoceremos parte de Europa, ya tienes el dinero y el permiso solamente falta que tu quieras. convenselas :: papers look into papers Estamos preparando el viaje mas largo y divertido que yo haya reverberation en toda mi vida. Ya estamos apuntadas dos amigas y yo. Queremos ir an Europa y conocer varios paises. Pero tenemos que vonencer a dos amigas mas para tener mas ambiente y protegernos una con otra. Ya tenemos la mayoria de edad y estamos preparando para que este viaje este inolvidable. Laura no quiere ir porque tiene miedo a viajar por avion y Elizabeth no quiere porque quiere pasar las vacaciones de verano con sus padres. Tenemos que convenserlas para que este viaje ocean muy emocionante y placentero en task el mes de junio. Empezare por convenzer a Laura. Ella es un poco timida, le teme a las alturas y a los aviones. Claro que a los juegos mecanicos le encanta subirse y sentir la adrenalina. Tratare por convenserla que no tiene chiste subirse an un avion es sumamente seguro. La seguridad es lo early stage es casi imposible que vuelva a sucerder algo como terrorismo. Los pilotos y los copilotos child sumamente precavidos. Los mecanicos siempre revisan el avion risks del vuelo. Vale la pena subirse an un avion para este maravilloso viaje. Conoceremos Espaã ±a, Roma, Venecia, y muchos paises mas que no puedo escojer. Lo que puede haber tambien le dije a Laura child turbulencias pero eso no es siempre, solamente en dadas ocaciones y siempre avisan con tiempo para que te pongas el cinturon de seguridad. Aparte si te gustan los juegos mecanicos hasta se te puede hacer divertido viajar en avion. Porque nuca lo hayas reverberation y porque tu mother le tiene pavor a los aviones no significa que tu tampoco vaz a soportar el vuelo hacia Europa. Ademas segã ºn estudios realizados por prestigiosas aseguranzas dicen que es mucho mas seguro viajar por avion que por automovil. Convenzi an Elizabeth que este viaje es algo muy interesante sera la primera vez que viajamos todas juntas. Solamente child dos semanas y conoceremos parte de Europa, ya tienes el dinero y el permiso solamente falta que tu quieras.

Saturday, August 22, 2020

Org behavior 3 leadership Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 5000 words

Organization conduct 3 authority - Essay Example The individual authority model+300 9 13 3.2. Abilities+400 13 3.3. Personality+400 16 3.4. Values+500 18 3.5. The conversation wanted successful hypothesis of leadership+500 20 References 23 Bibliography 24 Introduction This procedure must incorporate an organized method for self-evaluation and advancement of vital standards like crucial, beliefs, objectives and so forth. This paper will endeavor to introduce a precise strategy for empowering the administration characteristics. So as to meet this target, this paper is essentially isolated into three segments. The primary area will manage the self appraisal as it is important to recognize and break down the capability of being an effective pioneer. It is likewise significant for taking essential activities for the regions of upgrades. The subsequent segment incorporates the advancement of essential objective, strategic, and so on, and these elements are vital as it makes ready for sustaining the initiative quality. Indeed, this segmen t makes an important reason for empowering administration quality through legitimate bearing. The third area will introduce fundamental hypothetical foundations which are basic for molding administration characteristics. This area will likewise concentrate on the advancement of individual authority models and improvement of other administration characteristics like character, values, capacities and so forth. At long last, the whole conversation will be summarized in the end. 1. Mindfulness and Insight through Self-Assessment To help the need of mindfulness for authority improvement, Rothstein and Burke have remarked that â€Å"self-mindfulness gives a premise to reflection, decision, need setting, change and development† (Rothstein and Burke, 2010, p.5). The accompanying self-evaluation practice have surrounded based on five significant territories that incorporates authority possibilities, fearlessness, administration abilities, correspondence worry and innovative character. 1.1. Your administration potential with respect to evaluation identifying with preparation it is seen that I have scored 6 which thus imply a moderate to higher availability. Our bosses in this manner attempted to clarify the parts of the work to us to help improve our capacities to be progressively prepared with the errand doled out (Leadership, n.d., p.3; Bowerman and Wart, 2011, p.121). The components of participative and stewardship mirror a better than expected score of three and this shows our administrators not just helped work in a participative workplace yet additionally filled in as the defender of the assets both human and mechanical with respect to the association (Nolan, 1998, p.1). This information shows that our directors abstained from demonstrating a legitimate position and furthermore were not the visually impaired supporters of crafted by the subordinates (Waddell, 2006, p.2). 1.2. Your fearlessness regarding my character I am a dedicated and certain person who w ants to act naturally dependent in accomplishing the objectives set or endowed upon me by my bosses. This character characteristic likewise causes my bosses to all the more likely rely upon me for accomplishing errands of cutting edge level. In regard to the appraisal made the scores got in every one of the various parameters mirror an issue in my character where I reflect getting a twitch in regard to the ascending of some surprising occasion which might be antagonistic in nature. 1.3. Your group administration aptitudes This evaluation practice is additionally helpful in understanding the initiative direction of the authority type. The test for this sell-appraisal exerci

Sunday, July 26, 2020

Not a Real Entry

Not a Real Entry Last night, I was lying on my mattress somewhere near the precarious edge of the top bunk and feeling mildly superhero-esque in a thrill-seeking, daredevilish, almost-falling-out-of-bed sort of way. I remember vaguely attempting to fall asleep, having heard stories of people doing this at times as early as 2 AM (!). And then I woke up and it was 7:13 AM on Tuesday and I rolled out of bed and ran 3 miles and ate breakfast and walked to class and realized that electric fields sort of actually exist and dropped a class (Harmony and Counterpoint I) and added another class (Harmony and Counterpoint II) and signed up for an X-tra Special musicianship audition because I missed the actual auditions and trudged to the other side of campus and bought overpriced staff paper and suffered the pains of getting owned by the college bookstores price system and then snagged two free coupon books at the MIT bookstore instead of one to mitigate the obscene expensiveness of staff paper* and made a pear salad and harmonized a Bach chorale and plowed through linear algebra homework during a differential equations recitation and pontificated about furnaces with Edward 12 for 30 minutes and went to a lab meeting and started an e m problem set that had a lot of e and no m and ate Thai food at an advising group reunion and signed up to see Spring Awakening with my advising group in May and almost went square dancing with Donald Guy 12 who was carrying about 6 cans of soda in his coat pockets and instead stumbled home at 7:30 PM and finished reconstructing deconstructed fragments of Bach and checked mail** and switched differential recitation sections via MITs uber-convenient online course management system and then realized that I had harmonized the Bach chorale in the wrong key. *This is only acceptable if youre not an economics major. **Someone just regaled the dorm mailing list with an email querying, “Anyone have cool sunglasses I can borrow in the next 15 minutes?” Real blog entry coming soon to a theater near you. Or theatre, if youre on the wrong side of the Atlantic. In the meantime, I leave you with a taste of pictures to come: Bonus Challenge: Last week, Rebecca 12 concocted this resplendent magnum opus of cakery for a dorm potluck. Name the recipe, and Rebecca 12 will personally bake you a cake at CPW* after she kills me for promising this without her permission. *Should the winner be unable to come to CPW, an alternative prize will be arranged. Cryptic Hint With Bad Wordplay: The frosting does not mix with apples, nor is it the color that it appears to be.

Friday, May 22, 2020

Prison Systems Do Not Control The Number Of Prisoners Sent

Miguel Molina Professor Nikki Drago Crimes in America 26 March 27, 2016 Overcrowding in Prisons The prison systems do not control the number of prisoners sent to jails. However, they have to deal with the consequences of this fact. In the last twenty years, all over the world, it is experienced a rapid increase in the number of prisoners. This growth is not limited to any particular type of jurisdiction or political system - it is observed in all regions of the world. According to the incapacitation effect, the shorter the span of opportunity, the fewer offences they can commit during their lives; hence crime is reduced (Siegel 101). For example, in the United States, the number of inmates in prisons has increased from half a million in†¦show more content†¦In order to ease the burden on the budget, in the 80s of the twentieth century, in the United States there was a prisons privatization process and mass construction of private prisons. Companies that own and manage prisons, camps or centers of investigative isolators’ restitution, sign a contract with the fed eral government, state government or the district authorities. They agree to keep a definite amount of prisoners according to state standards, providing a corresponding security level. The managing company receives the guaranteed amount of money from the budget for each inmate (Kamrany). There are no strikes, unemployment and other problems associated with employment. Prison labor produces night-vision goggles, body armor, camouflage uniforms, radio and communication devices, and lighting systems and components for 30-mm to 300-mm battleship anti-aircraft guns, along with land mine sweepers and electro-optical equipment for the BAE Systems Bradley Fighting Vehicle’s laser rangefinder (Flounders). The UNICOR Company is one of the largest contractors for the U.S government which is run by prison labor. With the low cost of labor there is also an increase of costs to keep the convicts in prison. However, it is assumed that exactly the privatization of prisons has led to an increase in the prison population and, consequently, an increase in the cost of their maintenance, as well as overcrowding in prisons and detention facilities,

Friday, May 8, 2020

The Poisonwood Bible, By Barbara Kingsolver, And Jane Eyre

Family Tides Family is extremely valuable and the way you re raised completely molds the your behaviour and beliefs in the future. In the novels â€Å"The Poisonwood Bible,† by Barbara Kingsolver, and â€Å"Jane Eyre,† by Charlotte Bronte, the authors express that when children are brought up by a selfish guardian it will negatively affect them. â€Å"The Poisonwood Bible† is about a christian family of six who go down to the Belgian Congo on a mission trip to â€Å"save† the Congolese. But instead of â€Å"saving† them,â€Å"[they] aimed for no more than to have dominion over every creature that moved upon the earth†(Kingsolver 10). On the other hand the book â€Å"Jane Eyre,† is about a young orphaned heroine named Jane Eyre, and her journey through life in, victorian†¦show more content†¦Reed, she still is a very passive parent and doesn t have too much of a voice of her own, instead she lets Nathan speak for her. Since she is â€Å"the conqueror s wife† she she can t help but feel as nothing more than, â€Å"a conquest herself.† She’s about as authoritative as the late Mr. Reed which doesn’t make her the best parent to raise kids in the unfamiliar Belgian Congo. Within each story there were children who weren t affected by having selfish parents. Examples of children who were unaffected in the future despite their parentage were Jane and Adah. these two being the only exceptions because of their choice to distance themselves Adah and Jane would also distance themselves by seeking seclusion within books, making it a â€Å"transient stimulus,†(Bronte 17) of some sort, for both of them allowing them to escape their guardians. As both Jane, and Adah, grew up they both seeked education unlike the rest of their family. Jane physically got away from her relatives by pursuing an education. Although she â€Å"scarcely knew what school was,† (Bronte 70) she still real ly wanted to get schooling, and finally escape the Reeds. While Jane physically left her family Adah would mentally distance herself from her family. Instead of talking, she â€Å"keeps [her] thoughts to [herself],†(Kingsolver 34)

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Norman Mailer’s Stabbing of his Second Wife, Adele Morales Free Essays

Mr. Mailer was an eminent individual of America, he was known as a writer, film producer and director. He completed his Bachelors of Science in aeronautics from Harvard University in 1939. We will write a custom essay sample on Norman Mailer’s Stabbing of his Second Wife, Adele Morales or any similar topic only for you Order Now He became a very famous personality after writing many prominent novels. He married six times throughout his life. He had nine children, out of which eight were biological, and one was adopted. Norman Mailer was considered   Ã‚  a very gifted and assiduous person. In the year 1960, at a party held at his home, Mailer got drunk and stabbed his second wife, Adele Morale, practically killing her. Adele Morale was hurt in the abdomen and back of the body. Most people believed that Mailer was observed as the victim. Mailer had been motivated to do this by compulsion and mental illness, as there was no other reason which could be concluded for this sinful act. While few people criticize him and believe that Mailer did not have any admiration for women, he affirmed on a converse demonstrate, â€Å"Women ought to be kept in confine.†   In a Harper’s Magazine dissertation titled â€Å"The Prisoner of Sex†, he wrote, â€Å"The major accountability of a woman is to be on ground long enough to find the best mate for herself and envisage children who will perk up the species.† So in this research study we have covered all the facts which may be involved in Norman’s stabbing of his second wife, and have described the circumstances which provoked him to perform this violence. Life History ; Achievements of Norman Mailer Norman Mailer was an outstanding personality of the United States of America. He was an author, film producer and director. Normal Mailer was born in New Jersey in 1923. In 1939, Mailer completed his Bachelors of Science in aeronautics from the Harvard University. After completion of his edification, he initiated inscription of novels. In the year 1944, he was driven to the army, where he worked communally as a clerk and rifleman. In the year 1948, he started writing for the novel, â€Å"The Naked and The Death†. In this novel, he elucidated everything which he had perceived in World War II. This novel achieved more accomplishment than it was expected to. It was in 1960 when he wrote many dissertations and became a lead writer. In 1969, Mailer ran for mayor, this time on the â€Å"Secessionist† ticket, which included proposals that New York City become the fifty-first state and that disputes among young criminals be settled by jousting tournaments in Central Park. Mailer’s theatrical journalistic approach is presumed to be of highest esteem in the outstanding Armies of the Night. Mailer triumphed six percent of the ballot in a five man competition to turn out to be the Mayor of New York. He recognized the 1968 Republican and Democratic conference in Miami and the Siege of Chicago, and became the first man to corridor the Moon. During his life time, Mailer married six dissimilar women and had nine children from them, eight of which were his biological children and one was adopted. After spending a troublesome life, Mr. Mailer died at the age of 84 in New York, at Mount Sinai Hospital, due to renal failure. [Norm, Rich]. Marriages of Norman Mailer Norman Mailer married six times, his first marriage took place in the year 1943, and last in 1980. His first wife was Beatrice Silverman, they got married in 1943, and he divorced her in the year 1952. Adele Morales was his second wife, they got married on April 19, 1954 at City Hall, but after a few years, he attempted to kill her with a pen knife, and they were divorced after this ghastly incident. Lady Jeanne Campbell was the third wife of Mailer. They married in the year 1962 and were divorced in 1963. He then decided to marry Beverly Bentley in the year 1963. His fifth wife was Carol Steven whom he married in the year 1980; they were separated after one day of their marriage. He committed himself to Norris Church in the year 1980. [Norm, Sherry, Strifto]. The stabbing incident At a revelry in which Mr. Mailer was to announce his Mayoral candidature on the Secessionist ticket, he was heavily drunk and he stabbed his second wife Adele Morale, practically killing her. She was hit in the abdomen and back of the body, and was taken to the hospital at 8 am sharp. She was admitted to the hospital with an abrasion in close proximity to her heart. Shortly after, detectives went to question her about the incident, but they were told that she was in a very critical situation, and she could not answer their questions. The following day, the police was allowed to visit her as she was feeling better than before. She then informed them that her husband stabbed her on Sunday morning at 5 a.m. without any reason. He unexpectedly walked towards her, looked at her and stabbed her with a penknife. Adele refused to press accusation, so Mailer escaped this indignation within a fortnight at a psychiatric unit of Bellevue. This incident became one of the most terrible events of Mailer’s life. It has been a focal point for feminist critics of Mailer, who point to the subject of sexual aggression in his work.   This confrontation made him separate with his beloved wife. Furthermore, they divorced in the year 1962. This incident also blemished his career and the image he had made among fans. He was no more considered as a celebrity after stabbing his wife. Mailer also felt guilty for his act while appearing in a T.V. documentary.   He himself said, â€Å"The stabbing changed everything in my life. It is the one act I can look back on and regret for the rest of my life.† On the other hand, Adele Morales tells news reporters that Norman Mailer was never guilty for his act because if he was, it would show, additionally; he can never accept that he has any weakness in his character. Carl Rollyson unwrapped the biography of Mailer with narrations of John Maloney, an acquaintance of Mailer. It was in 1954, when Maloney stabbed his mistress and escaped. After a few years he was sent to jail but was released when the convict was taken back from his wife. At that moment, Mailer alleged to him, â€Å"God, I wish I had the courage to stab a woman like that. That was a real gutsy act.† That tells one all one needs to know about Norman Mailer’s idea of â€Å"courage.† In some instances, it conveys very modest disapproval surrounded by upscale intellectuals [Norm Kimball, 2007; Bart, 2007]. Circumstances and Causes of this Incident When the populace attempted to conclude on the subject of Mailer’s stabbing of his second wife, they were frequently bewildered. This was due to the fact that Mailer had a tremendous individuality and overwhelming intelligence, and had written many esteemed articles. While on other hand, he stabbed his wife so it is not very easy to conclude Mailer’s personality and circumstances which drove him to this act. However, we can have a spectacle on what a researcher considered about Norman Mailer, to make a conclusion about the cause of his violent act. Irving Howe believes that Mailer was observed as the victim. He also believes that Mailer had been motivated by compulsivity and mental illness as there was no other reason which can be concluded for this sin. Anyone who reads Mailer’s story would consider him as a victim and they would question themselves additionally, as to what the circumstances were, which forced him to do so. If Mailer’s attempt to assassinate his companion convened with little displeasure, the ‘American Dream’ would not run away so effortlessly. It had its admirer, and on the other hand critic Stanley Edgar Hyman, in an overwhelming review called Norman Mailer’s Luscious Rump, beam a lot, when it was called an appalling novel. Substantially added flamboyance than antagonism, it is a book whose dreadfulness is in actual fact begging description. It can be said that Mailer performed this violent act because he would be mentally depressed at times, as he had a troubling life. However, some people believe that Mailer was thought of as a celebrity who was a drinker and brawler, womanizer, biased campaigner, communal critic, talk-show guest, self-promoter, and symbol of male sexism. The stabbing incident became the evidence of Mailer’s reputation as a boisterous person too [Norm Kimball]. The above discussion clearly concludes that the causes of this incident may be   some mental illness, or it was his cruel nature towards women which made him   perform this horrible act. References Bart Barnes, November 11, 2007, A blustery force in life and letter retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2007/11/11/ST2007111101767.html. About.com, quotes about Norman Mailer previous marriages retrieved from http://marriage.about.com/od/thearts/a/normanmailer_3.htm Richard Avedo, Norman Mailer autobiography retrieved from   http://www.notablebiographies.com/Lo-Ma/Mailer-Norman.html. Mailer a dissenting view, Roger Kimball http://pajamasmedia.com/xpress/rogerkimball/2007/11/10/norman_mailer_a_dissenting_vie.php.                   How to cite Norman Mailer’s Stabbing of his Second Wife, Adele Morales, Essay examples

Tuesday, April 28, 2020

Negligence and Liability

Introduction Negligence is the largest of the three major categories of torts. It covers injuries or other losses caused by unreasonableness. The other two categories are intentional and strict liability torts (Statsky, 2011). The broad meaning of negligence is the failure to use reasonable care that an ordinary prudent person would have used in a similar situation, resulting in harm or other loss.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on Negligence and Liability specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The short definition of the same is injury or other loss caused by the failure to use reasonable care. Okrent (2009) defines negligence as tortfeasor’s failure to exercise reasonable care, thus causing a foreseeable injury to another person or that person’s property. Negligence liability exists when someone is at fault. The injury he or she causes must be due to an error or defect in judgment or conduct to w hich blame and culpability are attached. This paper provides an analysis of a news article written within the last six months that illustrates a case of negligence. The article to be discussed is one released on Newser, an online news site developed in the United States of America. Description of the Article The said article appeared in the Newser issue of August 14th, 2012. The article is about a Thai Senator who accidentally shot his secretary at a dinner. According to a report by the police, Senator Boonsong Kowawisarat was happily enjoying a meal with members of his family when he accidentally shot his ex-wife who allegedly worked as his secretary (Quinn, 2012). Although it might appear that the shot went off accidentally, it is not obvious why he chose to go for dinner with his submachine gun loaded. In a lawsuit, close relatives of the Senator’s ex-wife were the plaintiff while Senator Boonsong Kowawisarat was the defendant. Elements of Negligence According to Iyer (200 1), the elements of negligence include duty, breach of duty, proximate cause, or casual connection, and damages. Usually, the plaintiff has the burden of proving a number of things. First, he or she must be able to show that the defendant owed a duty to him or her. Second, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant breached the duty. Thirdly, the plaintiff must be able to prove that there is a proximate cause or casual connection between the breach of duty and the injury suffered (Okrent, 2009). Finally, there must be proof of damage or actual harm caused to the plaintiff.Advertising Looking for research paper on communications media? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Each of these elements is required for negligence to exist. If the answer to any of the elements is â€Å"No†, negligence does not exist. For example, the first is whether the tortfeasor owes a duty of reasonable care to the injured party. If not, then the analysis stops with the conclusion that no negligence has occurred. If yes, then one must ask whether the tortfeasor breached the duty of reasonable care. If not, the injury is finished, and once again, the analyst concludes that there was no negligence. If yes, then one continues querying through causation, and damages. Each element must be satisfied for negligence to exist. Contributory Negligence as a Form of Negligence Defense Contributory negligence is a form of negligence defense which the defendant could use to defeat the negligence action. Although â€Å"volenti non fit injury† or â€Å"to a willing person, injury is not done† is another option that may be used by the defendant, the contributory negligence is the best way to go. Under â€Å"volenti non fit injuria†, the Senator would escape liability for the consequences of negligence if the claimant expressly or impliedly agrees to accept the legal risk associated with the negligence. Generally, contri butory negligence is considered a partial defense to the majority of actions in tort, including negligence (Okrent, 2009). Where the court finds the fault on the part of both the claimant and the defendant, then the damages will be reduced to the extent that the court thinks just and equitable. According the Law Reform Act of 1945, if any person suffers damage as the result partly of his or her own fault and partly of the fault of any other person or persons, a claim in respect of that damage shall not be defeated by reason of the fault of the persons suffering the damage, but the damages recoverable in respect shall be reduced to such extent as the court thinks just and equitable considering the claimant’s share in the responsibility for the damage. This is sometimes referred to as the stalemate rule. If both parties were to blame, the law did nothing to compensate the loss. The statutory provisions mark a considerable improvement over the previous common law in terms of not only fairness but also simplicity since the stalemate rule was subject to considerable variation over the years. For example, the courts in England have devised a last opportunity rule whereby a plaintiff whose fault had played some part in creating a hazard could still recover damages if the defendant had the last chance to avoid the harm. This rule and many intricate variations around it need not detain us because they play no part in the current law. However, since fairness and justice are the guiding principles for reducing damages, it is important to note that fairness in apportionment, taking into account relative fault and responsibility for damage, might not produce fair outcomes overall.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on Negligence and Liability specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More This is a particular issue in actions for personal injury, and above all, in cases where there is a compulsory scheme o f the third party insurance. The portion of damages withheld because of contributory negligence frequently represents loss that the claimant must bear alone. For example, a cyclist who gets too close to a line of parked cars may have damages reduced if a car driver carelessly opens a door into his or her path. Similarly, a pedestrian who does not take sufficient care in crossing the road may have damages reduced even if the car that hits him or her was moving too fast. As a senior government official, Senator Boonsong Kowawisarat had a right to carry his submachine gun along with him wherever he went. There are not rules that restrict senior officials of his caliber to be not armed during meal, be it with family members or otherwise. It is, therefore, unfair for any person to claim that Senator Boonsong Kowawisarat intentionally shot dead his secretary. Despite the fact that the Senator was no longer living with his ex-wife, there are no indications of any conflicts happened between them. A case of Senator Boonsong Kowawisarat is something that could happen to any one else in his position. Furthermore, the secretary is also partly to blame for what happened. Unless she had sat directly facing the Senator, she probably would not have been shot. She could have been sitting elsewhere and the tragedy would not have occurred. I am, therefore, convinced that the victim should bear part of the blame and hence, contributory negligence can be used by the Senator in defense. The apportionment of responsibility between the parties, however, ought to be the most difficult aspect of the contributory negligence. Ideally, this apportionment should reflect responsibility for the damage suffered. Responsibility in this context is a question partly of causal influence and partly of degree of fault. Practically, courts arrive at the reduction in a fairly rough manner, without engaging in very detailed enquiries about causal impact or relative fault. Argument for or Against Proce eding with a Lawsuit In my opinion, the plaintiff does not need to proceed to press charges. As it has been explained above, the plaintiff bears equal responsibility. Pressing any charges against the Senator would thus be a waste of time and money. If the court correctly applied the Law Reform Act of 1945, then the plaintiff would be on the losing end.Advertising Looking for research paper on communications media? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More From the above description of the law, it appears that the secretary had the option of sitting elsewhere, not directly facing the Senator. It was her choice of a place to sit that eventually led to her being shot dead. Furthermore, the Senator had nothing to do with her decision to sit where she did. The right thing to do, therefore, would be to desist from proceeding with a lawsuit against the Senator. References Iyer, P. W. (2001). Nursing Malpractice, 2nd ed.. Tucson, AZ: Lawyers Judges Publishing Company. Okrent, C. J. (2009). Torts and Personal Injury Law. Clifton Park: Cengage Learning. Quinn, R. (2012, August 14). Thai Senator ‘Accidentally’ Shoots Secretary at Dinner: His Uzi Goes off in Restaurant. Newser. Retrieved from https://www.newser.com/story/152036/thai-senator-accidentally-shoots-secretary-at-dinner.html Statsky, W. P. (2011). Essentials of Torts. Clifton Park: Cengage Learning. This research paper on Negligence and Liability was written and submitted by user Santos Ramos to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.